FY 26 Budget Reconciliation Proposal Threatens Americans’ Health and the Nation’s Economic Security
Statement from J. Nadine Gracia, M.D., MSCE, Trust for America’s Health President and CEO
The budget reconciliation legislation being considered in the House of Representatives would have detrimental consequences for the health and economic security of our country. Access to healthcare, nutrition, and clean air are essential to the health of every family and community and are being jeopardized by proposed program cuts.
The proposed budget savings in the bill would result in millions of Americans losing access to healthcare, including through Medicaid. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the legislation would increase the number of uninsured people by at least 13.7 million by 2034 compared to the status quo — ultimately resulting in a 30 percent increase in the nation’s uninsured rate. This reversal would come after 15 years of progress in increasing coverage rates since the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.
These changes will lead to needless increased health risks for numerous population groups including children, older adults, people with disabilities, pregnant women, and people with behavioral health conditions. Taking away health insurance means fewer people have access to primary care and preventive services, such as cancer and blood pressure screenings. Preventable and manageable health conditions will lead to acute emergencies which will not only increase suffering but will also increase healthcare spending. Furthermore, additional healthcare facilities in rural areas will close due to higher rates of uncompensated care, and cuts to Medicaid will threaten access to pediatric care at children’s hospitals. More people will face medical bankruptcy. The costs of coverage losses are borne by all of us through higher individual payments and increased national spending on healthcare.
The legislation also would enact the largest cut to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (SNAP) program in history. Shifting additional benefit costs to states will lead to states either cutting program benefits or substantially limiting eligibility. Not only is SNAP a successful nutrition and food security program, it is also an effective anti-poverty program.
Finally, the bill would loosen pollution standards, eliminate block grants for communities to reduce pollution, and cut pollution monitoring programs while pulling back investments in clean energy. Air pollution is linked to stroke, aggravated asthma, and poor birth outcomes. The health-related spending from pollution and climate change is estimated to cost the U.S. $820 billion per year.
These cuts alone would bring more harm to the health and well-being of our nation, but when paired with the weakening of public health infrastructure due to recent federal budget and workforce reductions, they will lead to increased healthcare spending, higher individual healthcare costs, and worsening health. We urge all Representatives to vote no on this legislation and work in a bipartisan manner to assure the health of the nation.
